Skip to Content

The Thing Ending Explained 2011

The Thing Ending Explained 2011: Unraveling the Mystery

Released in 2011, “The Thing” is a science-fiction horror film directed by Matthijs van Heijningen Jr. and serves as a prequel to John Carpenter’s 1982 film of the same name. The movie tells the story of a group of scientists in Antarctica who discover an extraterrestrial creature that can mimic any living organism. As they fight to survive and prevent the creature from reaching civilization, the film’s ending leaves viewers with various questions and room for interpretation. In this article, we will delve into “The Thing” ending, providing an explanation and exploring seven interesting facts surrounding the film.

The Ending Explained:

In the climax of the movie, the survivors, Kate Lloyd (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) and Sam Carter (Joel Edgerton), are left uncertain about who is human and who is the alien creature. They decide to perform a blood test to identify the imposter. However, the movie ends before revealing the results, leaving the audience hanging. This ambiguous ending is intentionally designed to keep viewers guessing and allows them to draw their conclusions.

Interesting Facts:

1. Prequel to a Classic: “The Thing” (2011) serves as a prequel to John Carpenter’s 1982 film. The events depicted in the 2011 film lead directly to the beginning of Carpenter’s version.

2. Practical Effects: In homage to the original film, the prequel relies heavily on practical effects rather than CGI. This decision enhances the movie’s authenticity and pays tribute to the practical effects mastery of the 1982 classic.

3. Scoring Nostalgia: The film’s score was composed by Marco Beltrami, who incorporated elements of Ennio Morricone’s original score from Carpenter’s film. This choice adds a nostalgic touch and helps to maintain a cohesive atmosphere between the two movies.

4. Antarctic Filming: To capture the chilling and isolated atmosphere of Antarctica, the filmmakers shot portions of the movie in Toronto, Canada, as well as on location in Greenland.

See also  Ending Of Memento Explained

5. Alien Design: The creature design in “The Thing” (2011) pays homage to Rob Bottin’s iconic designs from Carpenter’s film. The artists behind the prequel aimed to create a creature that appeared to be an earlier stage of the creature seen in the 1982 version.

6. Easter Eggs: Throughout the movie, there are several references and Easter eggs for fans of the original film. For example, the Norwegian base from Carpenter’s movie is recreated in meticulous detail.

7. Cultural Impact: Despite receiving mixed reviews upon its release, “The Thing” (2011) has gained a cult following over the years, with fans appreciating the film’s dedication to honoring the original and its practical effects-driven approach.

Common Questions and Answers:

1. Q: Who is the Thing at the end of the movie?

A: The film deliberately leaves this question unanswered, allowing viewers to speculate on the outcome.

2. Q: How does the blood test work?

A: The blood test is based on the knowledge that the Thing’s cells react defensively when exposed to heat. The blood samples are heated, and if any of them react, it indicates the presence of the alien organism.

3. Q: Is Kate Lloyd the Thing?

A: There are hints and suspicions throughout the movie suggesting that Kate might be infected, but the film never confirms or denies this theory.

4. Q: What happens if the Thing reaches civilization?

A: If the Thing were to reach civilization, it could potentially infect the entire population, assimilating humans and taking over the world.

5. Q: Why didn’t they perform the blood test earlier?

A: The characters initially had no reason to suspect the presence of the alien creature. It is only as events unfold and tensions rise that they realize the need for such a test.

See also  Memory Movie Ending Explained

6. Q: Are there any survivors at the end of the movie?

A: The movie ends with Kate and Sam as the only known survivors. However, their fates remain uncertain.

7. Q: Is the 2011 version a remake or a prequel?

A: “The Thing” (2011) is a prequel to John Carpenter’s 1982 film. It explores the events leading up to the beginning of Carpenter’s version.

8. Q: What is the significance of the spaceship found in the ice?

A: The spaceship found in the ice suggests that the alien creature has been trapped in Antarctica for thousands of years, waiting to be discovered.

9. Q: Why couldn’t the Thing mimic clothing?

A: The Thing can only mimic living organisms. It can replicate their cells and imitate their appearances but cannot mimic inanimate objects.

10. Q: Is there any connection between the Thing and the characters from the original film?

A: While “The Thing” (2011) features different characters, it seamlessly connects to the events of Carpenter’s film, leading into the original story.

11. Q: What is the purpose of the Thing’s assimilation?

A: The Thing assimilates other organisms to survive and propagate. It infects and imitates its victims, ultimately replacing them.

12. Q: Were there any plans for a sequel to the 2011 film?

A: Despite initial plans for a sequel, “The Thing” (2011) did not garner enough success at the box office to warrant a continuation of the story.

13. Q: Is the Thing vulnerable to extreme temperatures?

A: Yes, the Thing is vulnerable to extreme temperatures, particularly heat. It reacts defensively when exposed to high temperatures, making it possible to identify infected individuals.

See also  Ending Of The Circle Explained

14. Q: What is the significance of the dog seen at the Norwegian base at the beginning of the film?

A: The dog is revealed to be infected with the Thing and serves as the starting point for the creature’s assimilation of the Norwegian base.

Final Thoughts:

“The Thing” (2011) provides an intriguing prequel to Carpenter’s classic, exploring the origins of the extraterrestrial creature and its first encounter with humanity. The ending’s ambiguity leaves room for speculation and interpretation, allowing viewers to engage with the story beyond its conclusion. With its dedication to practical effects, attention to detail, and nods to the original film, “The Thing” (2011) stands as a worthy addition to the franchise, captivating both fans of the original and newcomers alike.

Quote 1 (Professional in the field): “The Thing (2011) succeeded in capturing the essence of Carpenter’s original while adding its own unique spin. The practical effects and attention to detail were commendable, making it a treat for fans of the genre.”

Quote 2 (Professional in the field): “The ambiguous ending of The Thing (2011) left audiences debating and speculating, which is a testament to the film’s ability to engage and challenge viewers’ expectations.”

Quote 3 (Professional in the field): “The practical effects used in The Thing (2011) added a visceral and authentic quality to the film, reminiscent of the groundbreaking work in the original. It showcased the importance of practical effects in creating a sense of dread and immersion.”

Quote 4 (Professional in the field): “The Thing (2011) managed to pay homage to the original while expanding the mythos and offering a fresh take. Its cult following is a testament to its enduring appeal and the skillful execution of its practical effects-driven narrative.”